![]() ![]() ![]() Will There Be A Streaker In Super Bowl 56?īets of $9 are required to net $1 by winning on an occurrence of “no” on the above Super Bowl prop bet, indicating a 90% probability that a reaper performance of last year’s streaker incident does not happen tomorrow. The following odds for betting on Super Bowl 56 are currently taking action at MyBookie. It should come as no surprise that Bovada has lost its appetite for posting streaker Super Bowl prop bets. The offshore sportsbook giant had already been paying particularly close attention due to the enormous dollar amount wagered on the Super Bowl streaker prop and acted fast once the plot was revealed. The streaker bet would have paid out at $375,000.īecause he and his friends broadcast their wager to anyone who would listen, Bovada caught word and refunded all bets. Said idiot bet $50,000 on +650 odds that a streaker would run onto the field during Super Bowl 55, and then set forth in his plan to ensure the wager paid out first hand. The intellect of said “gentleman” was already in question after the Super Bowl streaker stunt, but a complete lack of cognitive ability became apparent when it was later revealed that he and a group of friends had actually bet on the occurrence at Bovada Sportsbook. We will continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player’s wager.During Super 55 in Raymond James Stadium, a Florida man who shall remain nameless decided it was a good idea to run onto the field of play and disrupt the championship proceedings. “Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered in our sportsbook. While Andrade did not make a $50,000 prop bet and he did not win $375,000, some of his acquaintances did make a number of smaller wagers that with the online sportsbook Bovada.īovada said that it was voiding all bets from people who had forehand knowledge of Andrade's stunt and that it was refunding bets to those who bet that there would not be a streaker during the game. 10, 2021, Front Office Sports reported that there was a small grain of truth to this claim. You actually think if there were 500 guys all betting $100 the streaker prop at the same time the book wouldn’t take it down. Gets bet up huge on Friday after the rehearsal. If Andrade couldn't place a $50,000 bet himself, what if he got hundreds of people to place smaller bets? Stewart threw cold water on that claim, too: Stewart said that it can be difficult to get a $200 prop bet, let alone one at $50,000: Kelly Stewart, another reporter who covers the gambling beat under the handle also noted that there was no chance someone would be allowed to make a $50,000 prop bet. "No book in their right mind would take $50K limits on that. Per a global-market sportsbook spokesperson: While social media posts and news articles might use "streaker" to describe Andrade, we doubt that a bookie backing a $50,000 bet would let this sort of technicality slide, especially when the gambler is attempting to game the system.įurthermore, it's unlikely that Andrade would have been able to gamble such a large sum of money on a prop bet (or novelty bet.) Pat Everson, a senior writer for the gambling website Covers, doubted someone would take a $50,000 bet on something like this:Ī lot of hullaballoo today about the #SuperBowl streaker purportedly making a $50K bet at +750 that there would be a streaker during the game. As seen in the meme above, Andrade was not naked when he ran across the football field. We have some doubts about this claim, to say the least.įor starters, a streaker, by definition, is a person who runs naked through a public space. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |